On 04-Oct-17 07:39 AM, marc marc wrote:
Hello,
Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit :
is there particular tagging that I should
be using where ways cross because of natural topography?
'covered=yes'? Something else?
you can/should put layer to parts of ways that don't cross
Nominally layer=0 is 'ground level'. In these situations the 'ground level'
folds back on itself - so both 'layers' are nominally 0.
I have a similar situation and have simply used covered=yes.
As there are no other paths that cross there is no conflict for my situation.
The cliff line crosses the path .. but that should cause no problem (rendering,
routing or?)?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
