The old hwy looks like it is being torn apart in a few area looking at the Digital Globe standard imagery. Track may be more appropriate.
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com> wrote: > DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the new road. Also we have a more up to > date map than Google in that area 😎 > > *Regards,* > > *Hans* > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> How about =proposed? >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed >> >> "For roads to be removed, use *proposed:highway*=no. This is understood >> by (at least) ITO's Transport Construction >> <http://product.itoworld.com/map/57> map." >> >> " >> >> - a further tag could be added to illustrate the expected beginning >> of construction and planned opening date. >> >> e.g. construction_start_expected >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:construction_start_expected&action=edit&redlink=1> >> =YYYY-MM-DD construction_end_expected >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction_end_expected> >> =YYYY-MM-DD" >> >> I don't know what that would do to routing - I'd guess that you could >> still force your GPS to go that way, but it wouldn't automatically pick it? >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme >> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
