Hi Aun, Do you know about JOSM's public transport assistant plugin?
Maybe we should set up a weekly online meeting, where everyone with an interest in public transport can come to get hands on explanations and where we can discuss these topics? I just figured out how to do Hangouts on Air. Which CEST evening would suit most people around here? On Tuesdays I have time starting at 20h, On Fridays it could be earlier. Saturday or Sunday evening are fine with me as well. Polyglot 2017-05-14 14:18 GMT+02:00 Aun Johnsen <li...@gimnechiske.org>: > Jo > > Thanks for the clarification, yeah I know that warnings in JOSM, specially > those with Info level, often can be ignored. As I am working with lines in > a metropolitan area with at least 7 different operators, I guess having > tidy relations make data more easy to validate. I have until now focused on > making master_route relations for lines with more than 1 route relation, > but can start looking into completing all routes with a master_route as my > work gets more completed. There is still a lot to do with more than 500 > lines + variations. > > Aun Johnsen > > > On May 12, 2017, at 18:16, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > > > Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 21:12:14 +0200 > > From: Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> > > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ordering of routes, possible mapathon? Was: Re: > > rail routes: how are platforms and stops associated (rail question > 2) > > Message-ID: > > <CAJ6DwMDovPVHrE3wVPxa66tT7_jP736fynoGBFoDRvViBEZb5w@mail. > gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > Hi Aun, > > > > JOSM's validator warnings are just that, warnings. Some of them can be > > safely ignored. Of course if the route_master relation doesn't really add > > information, I'd say it's fine to omit it. > > > > Here are some examples: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3614368/history > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3612781/history > > > > The tags on both relations are quite different. I like to have both of > > them, because I want to compare with data from the operators and then > it's > > good to have all of them "behave" in the same way. The route_master to > > describe the line, the route relations to describe the itineraries for > all > > the variations. > > > > We have a few more of those with only one route relation. For example the > > one going in the other direction on our ring road or some school buses > for > > students that only go from the station to the campus on Sunday evening. > On > > Friday they have enough possibilities with the standard offered lines. > > > > > > Polyglot > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
