It seems that I didn't realize that this was finalized, even though I was involved in the discussion.
Sorry for the misunderstanding! I'm really glad that the wiki has also been updated - I should have checked it first. I hope that the other "missing" landuses can be clarified or resolved in a similar manner. Javbw > On May 12, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Michael Reichert <naka...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi, > >> Am 2017-05-12 um 08:07 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: >> this was closed as duplicate, so they are aware there is an issue. >> In the discussion the only argument (by Nakaner, a rail enthusiast) >> is that there are 3 different legally relevant areas for train >> stations in Germany, so the German railway community has decided >> not to map any of them but use a node instead. Seems logical to >> you? > > There was a discussion about mapping station areas on the Tagging > mailing list in October. > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-October/030301.html > > Best regards > > Michael (Nakaner) > > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. > (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
