Hi André, according to this documentation, the tagging mailing list is the wrong platform to address this : "*If you have ideas for the wiki, you can generally just do them, by editing the wiki! * If you need any assistance the *wikiteam* are here to help." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki#Wikiteam
Unless some always ask for a proposal to edit /amend anything in the wiki. IMHO this leads to the result you mentioned : "Unfortunately, I'm very sorry to say, OSM is often much of a chaos." There seem to be very few people which first like to request a request form to be able to help the community to improve *. A "code of conduct"** would be helpful in which cases you may just add a minor specification, unfortunately I couldn't find such up to now. Cheers, Thilo * For those who don't know the concept of sarcasm : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm ** Certainly this will also leave some (border) cases which are disputable, but at least there would be SOME agreed guideline. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct Am 10.05.2017 um 15:10 schrieb André Pirard: > Hi, > > In this thread, I said, in agreement with others, > that oneway:bicycle > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle>=no (click to > open that page) is the tag to be used *to tell routing > software**(GPS)* that *oneway*=yes > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway>does not apply to bicycles > that cycleway > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway>=opposite* has > noting to do with routing and contraflow but indicates that *there is > a cycleway* that *happens* to be "opposite". > > Could you please make the wiki documentation more clear about that? > Because mappers often believe that cycleway=opposite means to indicate > bicycle contraflow oneway:bicycle=no. > Unfortunately, sometimes contradictory sentences about the same > concept are often spread all over the wiki. > Find them all! > > I have written this script > <http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%0A%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A60%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F%20gather%20results%0A%28%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20%0A%20way%5B%21%22oneway%3Abicycle%22%5D%5Bcycleway%7E%22opposite%22%5D%28%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D%29%3B%0A%20%20%0A%29%3B%0A%2F%2F%20print%20results%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B%0A%0A> > to find where many cycleway=opposite* exist without oneway:bicycle=no > and even without oneway=yes. > > Look at this street <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55150670> to > which GRi added cycleway=opposite without oneway:bicycle=no, to which > JanFi added oneway:bicycle=no probably after reading this thread > (thank you!) and from which I removed cycleway=opposite because there > is no cycleway at all. > > The worst of all is that the map > http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/%7Eligfietser/fiets/ shows > "cycleway=opposite or oneway:bicycle=no" ways, hence neither > identifying the cycleways nor the contraflow correctly and not > testing in its bugs tag that cycleway=opposite must contain > oneway:bicycle=no. > That is pitiful complete misinformation and the author did not even > reply to my message. > > Unfortunately, I'm very sorry to say, OSM is often much of a chaos. > > Hoping this will help, > Cheers > > André. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
