Hi Frederik, I think the main difference is that spaceports already exist (and are "on the ground") : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rocket_launch_sites
In case of the skyhook I'm not so surprised of the denial, given the culture of denial without constructive criticism which isn't controlled a.t.m. by an appropriate social rule. Will IMHO get worse the more people participate, imagine all facebook-users commenting proposals... What do you think about aeroway=spaceport ? I'm not a specialist in spaceport infrastructure, but I'd generally like to be able to filter for them in OSM, which isn't possible if they are tagged as "amenity=space_centre/spaceport/cosmodrome/..." See the examples mentioned here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#aeroway.3Dspaceport For further details I could imagine using aeroway=launchpad (similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dhelipad) The rest of the buildings should IMHO be similar to an airport, or standard tags may be used : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbunker Cheers, Thilo Am 28.04.2017 um 20:45 schrieb Thilo Haug OSM: > Hi all, > > I'm astonished there isn't a description for spaceports yet, > therefore the tagging differs widely : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#aeroway.3Dspaceport > > - Proposals / Opinions ? > > IMHO amenity doesn't fit well, > as it's just another kind of airport. > > Cheers, > Thilo > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
