I like inscription=* for inscriptions. Maybe add a historic=inscription as well. I'm not sure about the other ones. How will they be used by data consumers? Wouldn't a photo on OpenStreetCam be a better option?
Janko On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, 00:38 Martin Koppenhoefer, <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > While mapping a medieval village I have found some features I would like > to map but am not aware of established tags for them. > > These features are generally parts of building facades, for example > > - inscriptions, often initials of former proprietors or restoration dates. > Sometimes these are engraved in stone frames of doors, or they are engraved > into stones that are inserted into the facade > - particular (original historic) architectonic elements, e.g. a mullioned > window in a house > - other stone parts in the facade (spoils), e.g. consoles, sculptural > artwork (e.g. statues holding architectonic elements like oriels, etc.) > > > as these are parts of the facade and I would like to store their position > as well, I don't want to add them as properties to the buildings > themselves. Rather they could be ways or nodes, according to their size. > > > I am interested to learn if someone has already mapped something similar > and with which tags, or what you think would be a good representation. > > > Should I invent a new key facade:part=* ? > Or better use the historic key? > > Cheers, > Martin > > sent from a phone > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
