Hi Micah, Am 2017-04-14 um 18:49 schrieb Micah Cochran: > I've rewrote the proposal for improving toilet tagging. This is a second > request for comments. > > Now this proposal tags for occupancy (single or multi), gender/group > designation > of toilets that are within a place (where tagged "toilet=yes"), and a > prefix tagging scheme that will make the tags only apply to a > group(gender) designation > toilet. (For example, it allow you to be able to tag that there are > urinals in the men's room, but not the women's room.) > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Toilet_Tagging_Improvements > > Please put comments in the proposal's discussion section.
The wiki page currently contains many paragraphs which are struck out. Could you please delete them because they are no longer proposed by your proposal? The OpenSTreetMap Wiki has a version history of each page which shows you who edited the page at which time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Toilet_Tagging_Improvements&action=history That's why I think that the section "Revision Notes" is also not necessary. You can add a link to the previous discussions on the mailing lists which are the reason for the changes of your proposal. That would be great for people in future who want to understand your changes and why things are as they are. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
