2017-04-02 7:26 GMT+02:00 Warin <[email protected]>:

>
> The use of :type should depreciated in any key.
> Replacements? memorial:structure=* and memorial:commemorates=* ?
>
>
I agree that there is the general problem with :type that it is not clear
what kind of typology it is about (and sometimes there are othogonal
classes established under the same key, e.g. war_memorial and plate as
values under the same "memorial" key). The same problem is there for
subtags like
A=B
B=C
C=D
e.g. historic=memorial, memorial=*

Rather than "structure" I'd use "shape" or something similar.

Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to