Am 27.03.2017 um 17:29 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2017-03-27 16:34 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com
<mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>>:
In the case you have added e.g. a stop sign on the way. A second
mapper comes in, splits the way on the stop sign, reverts the
direction of one of the spit parts. Now the node is at the end of 2
ways with different direction and one cannot know what is
forward/backward in that node. But any good editor can give a
warning/error for such a case.
yes, the editor can issue a warning, but what should be the reaction
then? Shall we discourage changing way directions because of a stop
sign node on this way? Usually there's a good reason for people
changing way directions, adding more complexity to these changes with
highway signs depending on them is not necessary.
It is just a warning, that this is one of the seldom situations where
you need a relation - just check, obey and ignore afterwards.
Furthermore the editor can check for the relation too.
Yes there is a possibillity for such a situation, but I doubt they would
be essentially - and it can be solved by a relation.
But a pure possibility should not effect the majority of simple
situations - it is OSM-like to consider simple solutions and spare
relations for the difficult ones only.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
