+1
If you don't know .. then don't tag it.
(grass is not a land use, it is a land cover ... landcover=grass)
On 13-Mar-17 12:24 PM, Dalibor Jelínek wrote:
+1
:-)
Dalibor
-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfgang Zenker [mailto:wolfg...@lyxys.ka.sub.org]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:52 AM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots
* Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> [170312 23:51]:
On 03/12/2017 04:42 PM, Tristan Anderson wrote:
What is the most appropriate landuse tag for vacant lots in urban areas?
That is, land that was previously occupied by a house or other
building that has been demolished, no trace of the building remains,
and the land is currently overgrown or covered in untended grass. In
the past I have used brownfield, but this is for land scheduled for
redevelopment, which is often not the case.
Any of landuse=grass, natural=grassland, nautral=scrub, natural=wood
depending on just how overgrown it is. Unless someone has a better idea?
As that land is apparently unused, how about NOT tagging any landuse at all?
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
