Hi, On 03/10/2017 09:43 PM, Micah Cochran wrote: > #2. Single-stall versus Multi-stall tagging
There's also those male toilets with a discrete number of urinals and those where you have basically one wall-wide urinal used by as many people as manage to cram in ;) > #3. A way to tag the toilets male/female/unisex within an establishment. Until SotM Brussels I always assumed that an un-gendered amenity=toilets would automatically mean there'll be separate facilites for men an women, and only when accompanied with gender tags would it be limited to a specific sex. In Brussels there was a talk by a woman from India who - if I remember correctly - said that she'd usually not consider to even visit a toilet that was not explicitly marked as having capacity for women because the "default" over there seems to be it's for men. Which brings a whole new urgency to gender tagging. > #1. toilets: namespace > There could be a default toilets: namespace for when tagged within a > place/establishment. This would allow for tagging a richer level of > toilet information. I'm wary of tagging too many business details. I fear a toilets namespace would lead to people adding all sorts of observations about toilets that they used in some shop or other and that might at best be access=customers if not access=private. I think this would be going too far, it's almost as if we were to start taggin how wide the isles in a shop were or how many checkout desks or if they stock canned strawberries. I suggest to encourage the recording of details only for toilets that are explicitly public, and not those in restaurants or department stores. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
