Extra credit if we can come up with a 'universal' solution :-) Polyglot
2017-03-07 10:44 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com>: > This touches on a "conflict of interest" between two requirements: > (1) OSM tagging practice is to map only physically separated ways as > separate ways in OSM. > (2) A routing algorithm needs to have information about legally separated > ways, e.g. by a continuous white line. > > In the specific case the exit for the routing algorithm is at the > beginning of the continuous white line, i.e node > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4337339247 > whereas the split of the ways according to the rule of the separate ways > puts it at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/370544/, where the > motorway junction is placed at the moment. > > To my knowledge there is no agreed upon common practice. > > I do not map motorways in Germany, but have mapped motorways and trunk > roads in Italy where we have no established common approach, and you can > find a nice mix of different approaches. I think we should come to a > general best-practice or best-practices agreement. This may imply > country-dependent recommendations. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging