On 2017-01-23 21:15, Paul Norman wrote:
> On 1/23/2017 1:42 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>> This subject has been discussed so many times in the past, over several
>> years. It seems that OSM is incapable of moving forward. The current data
>> model does not accommodate multi-valued attributes
>
> It used to, then we moved forward to one that doesn't, because that's what
> all the tools work with.* Leadership was done, a choice was made on multiple
> values for a key in the data model, and now people are claiming a lack of
> leadership in the same choice.
Assuming you are referring to "semicolon syntax", then let's make it
clear what the baseline is, close down all these spurious time-wasting
discussions and replace them with a discussion whereby there is a status
quo and the challenger has to make a pretty damn convincing case to
overthrow the incumbent.
Can you point to an illustrative example of leadership on the subject of
MVAs?
I am most definitely not pointing fingers, and not seeking to apportion
blame. The consensus I am looking for is that "the system" has led to a
certain level of paralysis and we need to look at "the system" so we can
fix it.
--colin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
