sorry, ik ben nog een van die ouw zakken die een link niet herkent als er geen lijntje onderstaat :-)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:51 AM, joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: > André, > > This isn't about you - this is about project integrity. One lawsuit for > copyright infringement could be enough to kill the project. Or we could get > our data users into serious problems. Whether or not you are an excellent > mapper is not the question. It is just not something we can take chances > with. > > When you ask if you should tag copyrighted material as a source, I think we > can safely assume that you're talking about using that material as a source. > Which is never OK. > > I find it ironical that you are shocked by a warning about how serious this > is, and in the same message refer to the DWG as vandals. Of course they > break things, but that's only because they're too busy saving us from larger > problems than a few broken relations. But how can you be so sensitive when > it comes to you and so insensitive when it comes to others? > > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). If I > understand correctly what you are trying to do, then you don't even need to > do that. There are tools around which check for things like 'short section > of lower classification within a larger section of higher classification'. > > > Joost @ > Openstreetmap | Twitter | LinkedIn | Meetup > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
