On Jul 28, 2016 9:49 AM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > From the older scheme there is also the boundary=national_park tag in use with 18000 occurences: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_park
There's some reluctance in the US to use that tag for things that are not national (Adirondack Park) or not parks (Green Mountain National Forest). Those two examples are specific ones for which boundary=national _park seemed the least misleading legacy tagging. Leisure=nature_reserve gets applied to the more strongly protected areas inside. I'm working hard to make sure that New York is ready for the new schema, and I've added about 1500 boundary=protected_area tags over the last few months. Don't punish me by saying that I must remove the less informative tagging and have all that work disappear from the rendering while I'm waiting for the database and renderer to catch up. That's all I'm asking. It seems that some of the purists here are answering, 'No. If you want to see state forests, render the map yourself.' I do render it myself. I still think other people would want to see them, too.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
