2016-07-05 11:48 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org>: > Hm, maybe that is not so visible as a facility, but certainly lots of > fitter > seniors join to share a flat, with an individual room for each of them, > privately organised among them. >
indeed, I don't believe this would qualify in any way as a "social facility", nor would probably most of those that Greg defined above: " senior_age_restricted_housing: no special staff compared to any other apartment, but you have to be >= 55 or 65 and not have children living there." Maybe we have a more profound problem here with the "social facility" tag, and it comes out, it wasn't the best of all ideas to have "social facility" as a generic category? In the end, if this covers all kind of different stuff (soup kitchen, nursing home etc.) in one main tag, this main tag isn't very useful to anyone. On the other hand, we would likely have to put some residential facilities for elderly under this tag, but others clearly not. Maybe amenity=retirement_home and nursing_home was somehow better than this mashup? These are generic terms and could have been subtagged for special variants (like group homes), although they also bear some problems (e.g. the fact that most/many residential facilities for elderly offer both, nursing care and not, within the same facility). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
