Do you have an alternative? For example, incorporating Taginfo into the process. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:39 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > sent from a phone > > Am 23.02.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > > >>> Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional > >>> rejection; proposer to make final call. > >> > >> The tricky bit of course is that those percentages are "of the people > >> who voted". > > > > It is not surprising that only people who voted were voting. > > > yes, but it's surprising that we have made changes to the tagging system > via wiki so incredibly difficult. A minority of few more than a quarter of > all contributors could block the rest (e.g. if all of them voted) in a > decision. This is completely theoretical of course, but it illustrates that > there's likely something wrong with the current way of counting votes in > the wiki. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- *C/CMSgt Dominic Coletti, CAP* Whiskey Flight Sergeant, Raleigh-Wake Composite Squadron (H) 919-463-9554 U.S. Air Force Auxiliary GoCivilAirPatrol.com <http://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Civil-Air-Patrol/107647995924164> <http://instagram.com/civil__air__patrol> <https://twitter.com/civilairpatrol> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/civilairpatrol/sets/>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
