On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 18:49 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote: > It's about a cabinat with a defibrillator in it and a button on it to > call 112 as you can see here: > https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gmiQ8jjpqs9LqbQnXJe-_A/photo
"This image doesn’t exist, has been hidden or is part of a private project." Phil (trigpoint) > > At the moment I'm mapping it with two nodes. One emergency=phone and > one > emergency=defibrillator. > > On 2016-02-06 18:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > sent from a phone > > > > > Am 06.02.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl > > > >: > > > > > > If one function is clearly the primary function of the location > > > (e.g. mounting post, cabinet or whatever) then the secondary > > > function is sometimes tagged differently, e.g. emergency=phone, > > > defibrillator=yes > > > > > > it would surely be a "bit" of a stretch to state that the cabinet > > or the mounting post were the primary functions. > > (emergency=defibrillator, cabinet=yes). I agree that formally two > > unconnected nodes at "the same" location don't say it's a combined > > object, but IMHO the functions would still be represented well > > (because even if it's a combined object, a phone and an aed are > > different things with nothing in common besides maybe being > > integrated into one housing). If this is a common typology and > > especially if you want to express that it is a combined > > installation, it might merit its own tag (phone_and_defi...) > > > > cheers > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
