Nodes don't have an orientation, so I find it useful to put crossing=* tags on the footway/cycleway, so I can render it with a nice set of black and white stripes.
Eg: http://www.transportparadise.co.uk/cyclemap/?zoom=3&lat=51.74075&lon=-1.25238&layers=B0TF I also add the tags to the intersecting node, since some people (eg the cycle layer) make use of that data. Leave it alone. On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 06.02.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > > > So the 'problem' of conflicting crossing= tags may be better served by > requesting mappers to only declare one crossing= tag .. either; > > > I don't see the problem of possibly conflicting tagging: it indicates an > error. If you ask to only put the crossing tag on one element then you'll > likely get the same errors, just that you can't find them automatically any > more. On a bigger crossing over several carriageways there might also be > both present: uncontrolled (zebra-) crossings and traffic lights. I'm > adding the crossing=* to nodes on the carriageways that are crossed, and > believe that it belongs there. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
