On 27/01/2016 7:30 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:14:48 +0100
David Marchal <pene...@live.fr> wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:26:55 +0100
From: matkoni...@gmail.com
To: pene...@live.fr
CC: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging problem for a river running in a
culvert below a track / wiki votes enforcement
I think that photo of this object would be useful to decide how it
should be tagged.
Indeed; here comes the picture: http://1drv.ms/1ZQJCxT
Hendrikklaas told me by a private message "Simple tagging is
tunnel=culvert-bridge and add layer=-1 to avoid crossing conflicts.
Or leave it just tunnel=building_passage like you already did just
like any other road crossing a building but remember to add layers."
Should I consider this as a building?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards.
I would add to path tag bridge=low_water_crossing (documented at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge ) and layer=1, without
tagging culverts, without splitting waterway polygon.
+1 to leaving the waterway at level=0 (no tag required as this is the default
layer).
tagging this footway as bridge=low_water_crossing (documented at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge ), without
tagging culverts, without splitting waterway polygon, splitting stream
and tagging part under bridge as layer=-1 is equivalent.
layer=-1 to me says this is below natural ground level. And here that is not
the case - the road is above natural ground level and that should be tagged
layer=1 .. to be absolutely technically correct.
But many use the layer=-1 on culverts as a convenience of less work.
tunnel=building_passage
I am not understanding where that tag would be applied. What would be
tagged this way?
The convention it to tag what is inside the tunnel. Similar to a bridge where
what is on the bridge carries the tag.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
