I disagree. As mentioned, there seems to be little improvement given the rather large effort required. I prefer we spend the effort doing other more impactful changes.
And unlike other inconsistent cases of tagging, I don't think there is any confusion on what shop=jewelry means. As I understand it, using British English is just a convention and a recommendation for people considering new tags. It is not policy. On 1/14/16, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:46:48 +0100 > Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote: > >> All in all, it is a fairly large operation for a relatively small >> improvement, and I'm not sure if it's worth it. I wonder though what >> other mappers think. Would it make sense to switch the recommended tag >> to shop=jewellery? And if we do so, would a plan similarly to the one >> above make sense? > > It is quite long, but not so large. The most complex part is that > somebody need to set up reminder to execute later parts of plan. > > I would strongly support this change - consistent tagging is a good > thing. > > (I'm also writing this on personal title and not as > maintainer of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet.) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
