Thank you for all feedback. The feedback brought forward a couple of valuable points, but in my opinion these points don't require a change to the proposal. In particular, I don't think it's useful to explicitly state in the proposal whether or not customer parking should be included, and will leave this decision to the individual mapper. I also think aquatics centres are distinct enough from regular sport centres to warrant their own tag. The discussion on civic landuse is independent of this proposal. Thanks again for all input!
-- Matthijs On 25 December 2015 at 21:42, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a proposal page for the tag leisure=aquatics_centre: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Aquatics_centre > > The proposal is deliberately rather basic and does not contain a lot > of documentation on suggested subtags, as I'd prefer to focus the > discussion on the acceptance of the main tag, rather than getting lost > in a discussion concerning countless subtags for special cases. > > Please let me know what you think. > > -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
