I'm not sure either. The crossings are a bit unclear, there are only > pedestrian crossings, and the cycleway explicitly starts after the > crossing,
Formally the crossing is bicycle dismount, but, as the cycleway ends and re-starts at the pedestrian crossing, by the wonders of the Italian laws/rules/whatever this pedestrian crossing is not a pedestrian crossng, but a bicycle and pedestrian crossing, even though nobody knows that (all tanks to our FIAB expert and his written enquiries with the Ministry of Transport) <https://www.google.it/maps/@41.852339,12.4879281,3a,20.2y,80.52h,86.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKakvcxFc8HLdy39dy_rVAw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en> > btw., the tagging is wrong, as foot should be permissive, > foot=no is the correct tagging, as the path shows clearly the white bicycle on a blue disk.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging