On 2015-11-27 10:06, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote : > > 2015-11-26 21:12 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: > > It is even mandatory when you have to make nested boundaries that > have no admin_level like the two boundary systems we have in > Belgium (political and linguistic). > > > can you give an example how this is modeled, e.g. a relation in osm? > Having 2 kind of different boundary systems at first glance seems to > be best modeled with 2 kind of boundary types in OSM.
???? The boundary system we have in Belgium (that you mention). Any other language partitioning of a country. The ceremonial counties case. ... Cheers André.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
