Please use "species:wikidata=Q140957". The wikidata=* tag should be used only when the thing you are tagging is exactly, not more or less, the thing described in the wiki article. So for example, you can tag the tree Árbol del Tule [1] with wikidata=Q252182 [2] and species:wikidata=Q1429751 [3]
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81rbol_del_Tule [2] https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q252182 [3] https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1429751 čet, 26. stu 2015. 00:14 Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> je napisao: > Here are the tags I include in my JOSM preset for a species of tree I want > to include in OSM. > > <key key="natural" value="tree" /> > <key key="leaf_type" value="broadleaved" /> > <key key="leaf_cycle" value="evergreen" /> > <key key="species" value="Dipterocarpus alatus" /> > <key key="species:en" value="Yang na" /> > <key key="species:th" value="ยางนา" /> > <key key="wikidata" value="Q140957" > <key key="wikipedia" value="en:Dipterocarpus_alatus" > /> > <text key="height" text="Height (m)" default="" > delete_if_empty="true" /> > <text key="height_trunk" text="Bole Height (m)" > default="" delete_if_empty="true" /> > <text key="circumference" text="Trunk Circ. (m)" > default="" delete_if_empty="true" /> > <text key="diameter_crown" text="Crown Diam. (m)" > default="" delete_if_empty="true" /> > <text key="ref" text="Ref #" default="" > delete_if_empty="true" /> > > > > My understanding is that the species tag is preferred to hold the Latin or > scientific name. The species:en and species:th variants hold the "common > name" in English and Thai but I'm sure there is disagreement and variations > here as well. > > Comments? > > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:23:13 +0100 >> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > 2015-11-25 19:51 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > > In that case that there is no article about this particular tree >> > > using wikipedia tag is incorrect. Use wikipedia:species or similar >> > > key. >> > > >> > >> > >> > I suggest doing it the other way round (not the species of wikipedia, >> > but the wikipedia article for the species), i.e. >> > species:wikipedia >> > >> > it is already done like this btw (in insignificant numbers so far): >> > http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/species%3Awikidata >> >> Yes, you are right (like it is done with brand:wikipedia, >> subject:wikipedia etc). >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
