Colin Smale wrote: > Is the situation now clear? Is it now (unambiguously) clear to > (all) mappers how to tag paths?
No. > So you are saying that any discussions on the mailing lists are > just distractions as the real decisions are taken elsewhere. > Where would that be then? They're not expressly "taken elsewhere". Generally, good practice in OSM - whether in tagging, development, or whatever - _evolves_ from clued-up people doing things well, documenting what they do, and others adopting these practices. Endless tagging debates on this list and the wiki don't help this process, and often hinder it by replacing this natural selection process with arbitrary mechanisms such as voting. In other words, tagging@ and the wiki are the Golgafrincham B Ark of OSM. You'll forgive me for not answering the remainder of the six questions but it's Friday and I too am now losing the will to live. :| Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/More-human-readable-values-for-traffic-signs-tp5857897p5858331.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
