On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > I don't think that this is a strong point. > Thinking about my own edits I'd say that the > length could be +/- 4m because typically I just try to place > the nodes somewhere neer the road, if I find an existing > node that looks good enough I use that. > On the other hand, I think we make > assumptions about the width of the road based on its > type (primary, secondary ,etc), > so this assumption would also apply on the culvert.
So we implicitly assume a width of a road now we propagate
this fault to all attached objects?
We should reduce errors by implicitly assuming something not
increase them.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
