Does the pipe have to be below the road? There could be another tunnel below the culvert as well.
In any case the pipe and the road are (in real life, and by design) not connected and if they share a node it will doubtless lead to all kinds of QA complaints. --colin On 2015-10-25 10:38, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the feedback. I think tunnel=culvert is special, > my understanding is that it implies that the water goes through > some kind of pipe. So tunnel=culvert on a node > simply implies that the waterway is below the road, > no layer tag is needed. > > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: Ineiev <ine...@gnu.org> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 10:27 > An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] tunnel=culvert > > Hello, > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:44:17PM -0700, GerdP wrote: > >> Now I noticed that the wiki also "allows" to use tunnel=culvert >> on a node, > > On the other hand, the wiki "disallows" to use tunnel=* on a node. > >> but this is rarely used >> (taginfo shows 945 tags on nodes and > 305.000 on ways) >> I wonder why. The usage of a node seems to be clearer for me, >> at least in those cases where the tunnel is almost as broad as the >> road. > > What would be in the tunnel? the waterway or the highway? how would > the layer= apply? > >> In my eyes it is the same case as with a >> railway=level_crossing. We map it as a node (and only as a node). >> Did I miss something? > > In this case, the highway and the railway share the same level. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
