On 28/09/2015 15:24, Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 28.09.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Andy Townsend:
Depends on the pub, I'd say. Some places are both a hotel and a pub,
some have essentially separate "hotel" and "pub" bits (for which 2
nodes within a building might work) and some (e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/75844692 ) are pubs that do
accommodation, but not really hotels, so I'd use accommodation=yes
for those.
Why not the already established tourism=guest_house for this B&B offer?
This particular example isn't really a guest house (or a B&B for that
matter). Handily, there's an example of a guest house just down the
street at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185207730 .
So what's "guest-housy" about one vs "not-guest-housy" about the other?
How about a quiet downstairs lounge in one vs a crowded bar full of
welsh people trying to buy beer in the other, and a nicely maintained
garden with some bee-hives in it vs a muddy area where the beer festival
tent was? FWIW the pub's an excellent pub and the guest-house is an
excellent guest-house, but they're not really the same animal. You
could perhaps make a case for "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" or it's
slightly less popular cousin "guest_house=bed_and_breakfast" for the
pub, but that's a different argument.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
