> Which is why mapping this is not really within the scope of OSM - 
> natural underground waterflows are inherently non-verifiable.  

Well, maybe I should let that down, then, or put the data in the description 
field; this way, I won't mess with the OSM data, but they'll be there if 
someone is interested.

> You can and should map the surface phenomena related to the underground 
> water flow of course - ponors, dolines, karst springs and other stuff.

In fact, I'm drafting a proposal on this, which is why I asked this, to know if 
I could put something consistent on this matter in the proposal.

Regards.                                          
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to