> On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> and you can also make combinations without having to decide for footway, 
> cycleway or bridleway. Also, without any further access tags, path is neutral 
> and open to all unmotorized means of transport (unlike footway, cycleway etc.)



In a national park, where I have a trail through the wilderness, where foot and 
horse traffic is allowed, but not bikes - this makes perfect sense.
 These are the rules for the the trails in my state parks. mountain bikes (for 
recreation) are only allowed on fire roads (tracks). 


So… It is a path. Where horses and people are allowed. 


If I have a cycleway that is built to cycleway specs (paved, rounded turns, 
lanes, and no stairs), but peds are still allowed, then it is a cycleway with 
foot access =yes

I would never consider tagging that as =path with foot & cycle =yes. I would 
consider a cycleway tagged as such mis-tagged and correct it. 

It plainly is not a path. it is a concrete walkway built to accommodate bicycle 
(commuter & daily life) traffic. It is built to a much higher grade than a 
path, and expectations of usage is very different.

If I have a sidewalk along a road, where it may be implicitly signed that bikes 
are allowed (like most of Japan), but it is built to footway specs (tons of 
poles, driveways, road crossings) - it is a =footway with bicycle=yes. The 
amount of ambiguous walkways based on their grade and construction for usage is 
very rare. And none of them could be confused with a 60cm wide dirt path 
through the forest.  

walking/biking to the mall and walking/biking through the wilderness have very 
different expectations of grade of the way. There are variances - but: 


Sidewalk  ≠ Path 

Motorway ≠ track 

we reflect that in the roadway tags. it should be equally obvious in the 
non-roadway tags as well. We don’t have a highway=main tag that could cover 
tracks to motorwayish roads, because that is bad ambiguous tagging! this issue 
with path exactly the same, IMO. 

Javbw. 

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to