Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your
wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!
Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because
they may never come to reality, but planned routes are ones that have passed
the usual planning discussions and are awaiting construction, which can
sometimes be many months or years, but will happen, short of a political change
of heart.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Volker Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 18:38
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
This is a question of language.
The OSM life cycle discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
lists "planned" as duplicate of "proposed". I would agree with that.
As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways, not
only those where you can already see the construction work going on.
This has the added value when you plan a trip, that you would be alerted to
possible problems (in case the local mappers missed the transition from
"planned" to "construction"). I would tend to suggest that we keep the Proposed
and Under Construction objects visualised with different representation.
Volker
(Italy)
On 14 July 2015 at 19:23, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote:
Hi,
We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM
map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be
really constructed:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654
Is highway=planned a good choice to be rendered instead or some other tagging
scheme would be better?
--
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags down"
[A. Cohen]
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
