On 25/05/2015, Andreas Goss <andi...@t-online.de> wrote: >> ikidata will always be playing catch-up to wikipedia, to >> some extent. > > Can you just show me a single Wikipedia entry without a Wikidata object.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_map_projections Ok, maybe that one doesn't count because it's kind of metadata that doesn't belong in wikidata. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Campagne_(restaurant)&action=history https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q15207004&action=history Hum, 2 months lag between data and pedia. Technically it proves my point about the lag, but it isn't too bad. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Whiddy_Island_Disaster&action=history https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q780440&action=history 3.5 years is worse, but maybe the import-from-pedia bot wasn't active until recently ? No time to look for more right now. Didn't find wikidata links on the wikipedia articles, it would have made search faster. I admit the lag is fairly short, and many pedia article that I didn't expect to find in wikidata were in fact there. Your confidence in wikidata indicates that you know it well, which I've stated is not my case. If, instead of asking rhetoric questions, you can shed light on some inner workings of wikidata that garanties that all OSM-worthy objects with a wikipedia article will also have a wikidata item (and vice-versa), I'd be happy to forget about that imagined downside of wikidata compared to wikipedia. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
