On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 6:32 PM, pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > How about mapping a cemetery with connected smaller cemeteries ? That's > what I've done to distinguish different areas and names. > > Though you are of course free to do it anyway you find reasonable, I don't think it's a good solution: If there is only one cemetery, it should be mapped as one. It's about semantics: — How many cemeteries do you have in your city — 5. — How many sectors (sections)? — 154.
In your case you'll get as many cemeteries as sectors. I don't think it's what you mean. Also, for a cemetery that has a name, it would mean you have several cemeteries with the same name. Again, suboptimal. I prefer to map it the way it is: a single cemetery with multiple composing areas Cheers, Kotya > -- > Mike. > @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - > For all your info on Millom and South Copeland > via *the area's premier website - * > > *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, > property & pets* > > T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
