Do you plan to use the same prefix for vehicle, foot, ... ? Or just for the categories that you listed ?
regards m On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > There was discussion about the contact: prefix... now how about the > "access" tags? > > There are a lot of them, and trying to gather and present them is very > hard: > > hov > boat > motorboat > canoe > bulk > tanker > mofa > moped > dog > hazmat > bicycle > imdg > ice_skates > ... > ... > ... > > > These could be mechanically retagged into a namespace: > > access:hov=yes > access:boat=yes > access:motorboat=yes > access:canoe=yes > access:bulk=yes > access:tanker=yes > access:mofa=no > access:moped=yes > access:dog=yes > access:hazmat=destination > access:bicycle=customers > access:imdg=yes > access:ice_skates=designated > > > Or perhaps semicolons: > > access:designated=bicycle > > access:no=dog;mofa;moped;canoe;ice_skates > > > > And perhaps a small set of "superclasses" could emerge, > for use in rendering: > > foot > watercraft > human_powered_vehicle > motor_vehicle > motor_cycle > heavy_motor_vehicle > > mobility_aid (e.g. wheelchair) > > animal > > With the present rich set of tags showing up at level three or more: > > access:animal=yes > access:animal:cat=no > access:animal:dog=designated > > Thoughts? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
