On 22/04/2015, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:34 AM, moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> smoking=yes/no/outside/etc for the general value >> smoking:<type>=yes/no/etc for exceptions >> With <type> being any of cigarette, e-cigarette, hooka, marijuana, opium, >> etc. > > That would quickly get unwieldy, trying to tag different restrictions for > each nicotine delivery method. > > However just repeating the smoking tagging scheme can cover all cases > the smoking tag does: > > smoking=no > vaporizing=no > vaporizing:outside=separated > smoking:outside=no
How is it unwieldy ? Your scheme uses exactly as many keys as mine for a given usecase. The only difference is that I put everything under a single namespace, which makes it tidyer and more discoverable. Also, being and an evolution of the existing rather than a brand new tag, and having a general value, consumers that aren't up to date with the latest tagging trend will still get a somewhat usable value. Lastly, I'm not a fan of the term "vaporising" : it's rather new and not yet well established. It has other meanings that have nothing to do with nicotine. It's confusing. There was a discussion about the value for shop= not too long ago, and "e-cigarette" eventually came slightly on top (now reflected in taginfo). I think it's much clearer than "vape" and derivatives, _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
