So if you don't know the real shape of the polygon it would be best to create a placeholder polygon (like a circle - it will be clear that it is a placeholder) and put all amenities inside it until the real shape is known.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:33 AM Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Overpass understands this. When I look for all toilets in the "Zoo > Antwerpen" with [1], I only find toilets in that Zoo > > regards > > m > > [1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8qL > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> OK, I did not know that ! Is this "is-in-polygon" test something that >>> is already being done ? Examples ? >>> >> >> Nominatim that adds the address of the building to the POI is an example >> of a similar test / algorithm. >> Sorry, don't know any other examples. But it just makes sense that you do >> not have to define inclusion of something when you can determine that from >> it's position. >> >> I also only know 1 website that supports the site relation, the >> geschichtskarte for historical items >> >> regards >> >> m >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
