Hi Pieren, You are correct for most bush campsites where you stay mainly for the beauty of the environment. I have mapped those myself only in cases other reasons existed to map than. However, places you select for security or for availability of amenities you want to have on the map. This will be more of an issue in Africa than in Europe, but in countries without a camping culture you need this. In my earlier mail I have given a number of examples of such places that we visited. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:50 AM Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We can use tourism=camp_site:non_designated for all cases that the area > is > > not (permanently or ad-hoc) designated. This included the following real > > life cases: > > Jan, I really appreciate your efforts to find a consensus. But I > couldn't agree on tagging such informal locations. It is so > subjective, it can be set potentially everywhere in the countryside, > everywhere you can install a tent. If the aim is to advertise a nice > point of view, the risk is also that you encourage wild camping on the > same place, increasing tourists attendance (and littering). > The best location for wild camping is a beautiful and unique spot > which was never used before you and will never be used after your > night, no ? > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
