The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2 rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards, *Jan van Bekkum* www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com> wrote: > The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7 approval votes, > and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the voting period > for another week. > > Regards, > > Jan > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote: >> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: >> > >> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated previously >> >> allowed to vote? >> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, sitting back and >> > only being involved to vote 'no' is - >> > >> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners rules. >> > >> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a proposal, where >> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake of killing >> > it ? >> >> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the >> comments/draft time to do that. >> >> > >> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any community, >> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! Perhaps a short >> > para on good manners on the voting page ? >> >> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments section. With >> an expansion on the voting section? >> >> > >> > David >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
