On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:31:36PM +0000, Malcolm Herring wrote: > On 26/03/2015 12:35, Richard Z. wrote: > >How do people think about it? Should we generalise that approach > >or seek another solutions? > > The way I have approached this is to map separate areas above and below the > natural=coastline way & add the tag tidal=yes on the below HW area.
has the rendering of the tidal areas been defined somehow? > >Should we use underwater/awash tag or prefix? > > The OpenSeaMap object underwater/awash rock (seamark:type=rock) only refers > to isolated rocks rather than a rocky seabed. Therefore it is only > appropriate on a node. how about underwater:natural=* and awash:natural=* ? Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
