Combination of 2 and 3. It must be possible to distinguish between vehicles. As I wrote earlier a stretch of road that is reasonable for a 4WD can be horrible for a motorcycle and vice versa.
A scale in words very bad, bad, ... very good or whatever at least helps me to remember what the "good end of the scale" is. The first time I will have to look in the wiki to get a feeling about the boundaries between the levels, after that I should be able to do without. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:44 AM Ineiev <ine...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 02:00:51PM +1100, David wrote: > > Been a good discussion on new tags for smoothness=. Time, imho, to > > ask people to indicate just what they do like. How about a show of > > hands for one or more of - > > > > 1. Numeric tags, perhaps grade1 .. grade8 similar to tracktype. > > > > 2. Words that describe the smoothness - > > glassy -smooth -rough -bumpy - rutted .... > > > > 3. Words that describe the (wheeled) vehicle that might use it - > > Any_vehicle, city_car_bike, 4x4_mtb, off_road_vehicle, > extreme_vehicle, none. > > 4. Combined: grade1 ... grade8 glassy smooth ... any_vehicle ... > extreme_vehicle and "grade1;glassy;any_vehicle" (or surface_grade=1 > roughness=glassy approved_for=any_vehicle). > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
