+1 for reception_point
+0 for amenity
-1 for tourism
-10 for landuse

2015-03-13 10:01 GMT+01:00 Alex Rollin <alex.rol...@gmail.com>:

> +1 for amenity
> -1 for tourism
> +1 for reception_point (it might not be a desk, right? point=desk?)
>
> is there some JOSM/other validation issue with an amenity being inside
> another amenity?
>
> if so, then, I woudl hope that would be addressed..and if not, yay!
>
> or...
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information
>
> landuse=reception_point
>
>
>
> --
> Alex
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>    - Of course it is not tourism, but amenity: it is not a goal by
>>    itself, but an amenity of something larger. There probably more reception
>>    desks at industrial compounds etc. than at campsites;
>>    - If you can't tag it as an area you still will place the note as
>>    accurately as possible where the reception desk is; anyhow it should be
>>    part of an area relation. We have been in situations that the camping
>>    reception was outside the campground itself, two blocks away in a shop
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:49 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> One personal factual example;
>>>
>>>   5 buildings with an area including parking, landscaping etc .. of
>>> about 2 square kilometers
>>>
>>> One reception desk. Yes only one.
>>>
>>> The node of reception desk is spatially within the area .. so
>>> 'connected' to the rest .. as are the car parks within the area.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13/03/2015 11:25 AM, Andreas Goss wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> anything that is big enough to have a reception is better represented
>>> >> by an area than by a node- IMHO. At the time I micromap  the
>>> >> reception I'd likely also convert the node POI into an area
>>> >
>>> > So how do you now connect the reception with the area? What if you
>>> > have different levels?
>>> >
>>> > __________
>>> > openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
>>> > wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Tagging mailing list
>>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to