If group is not a good word, then "set" is a good alternative. Javbw
> On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a > length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light signals. > I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection? > > And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many intersections) or a > district wide coordination of traffic signals occurs? If the name 'traffic > signals group' is taken what name would you give this? May be a different > name for this 'group'? Such as ? traffic signals set? > >> On 26/02/2015 8:59 AM, Lukas Sommer wrote: >> Hello. >> >> This is a request for comments for the proposal >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals_group >> >> The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some >> supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17! >> >> Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of Lukas >> Schaus, this is _not_ about traffic light circuits, but just about >> grouping together all nodes with highway=traffic_signals that belong >> to a traffic signal system at one place. This could be useful in >> Japan, where traffic signal systems have namen. (Thanks to nyampire >> and javbw for suggestions and comments.) This could be useful for >> routing/turn-to-turn navigation engines to calculate better the time >> penalty for the traffic signal system. >> >> Best regards >> >> sommerluk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
