On 13.02.15 14:04, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Is there a seasonal difference in the routes?
Absolutely. This has nothing to do with each other. Of course, a cross-country skiing track is lead along what is a forestry track in summer or so. But that's what a route relation is good for. But the signposts for the winter track are built up in winter only (often). The route may not exist in summer. Or it might be part of a say nordic walking track in summer, but the complete route is different. Those always should be sperated. Keep in mind, I'm talking about the route. One track/path can of course be part of more than one route (summer or winter). But again, that's what different route relations are good for. > Then there could be "summer only" routes similarly restricted with access > tags: > foot=yes, running=designated, motor_vehicle=no, bicycle=no Interesting idea, but as I already tried to point out, there are routes for running only, there are routes for nordic walking only (they sometimes share parts of the routes, though). A completely different thing is (mountain) hiking. And a cycling route is completely different from a mountain bike route. Different selection of the route (of course), different numbering, different numbering scheme. Those should always be kept seperate, IMHO. /al _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
