On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Kotya Karapetyan <kotya.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As of today, a total of 16 votes have been submitted, 11 of them are > approvals. Since 2 weeks have passed and the required number of votes > (15) has been reached, I have closed the voting and will proceed with > clean up. Sorry but you could extend the period of feedbacks. 7 of the 11 positive "votes" came before the 13th january when I posted my comments about the possible issues (and the discussion forwarded here which probably drew more attention to more people). After this date the trend was much more balanced. You say you are aware of the clash with amenity=drinking_water but you don't explain how you will avoid this in your cleanup. You also agree that we need a rework but your proposal is just increasing the difficulties than solving them in the future. Now, for a water tap in the public space, it will be tagged with "amenity=drinking_water". And for the same water tap inside or near a cemetery, it will be tagged with "man_made=water_tap". How can we explain that to newcomers ? why "amenity" in one case and "man_made" on the other ? what is implied about potability ? etc Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
