The situation in India could mean that a congregation was meeting on that
site, and planned to construct a building there, but had not yet done so.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On January 3, 2015 5:03:10 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/01/2015 4:56 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:45:24 +0100
> From: Andreas Goss<andi...@t-online.de>
> To:tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and
> terminal without building tag
> Message-ID:<m87okr$iep$1...@ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>> >landuse=religious
> Which still nobody knows what it is supposed to be used for...
I too don't know what it is to be used for. However Australian
Aborigines have 'sacred sites' that could be tagged that way. Ayres Rock
springs to mind. One scrared site was vandalised... the road that goes
past it has been closed for at least 30 years. So the sites are
important, but they may not want the public to know their location due
to the possible vandalism. I've come across a site in India that was
tagged for a church IIRC .. but no building was present.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
