I would dispute "Just because the node is tagged as *wayside_shrine* in combination with *natural=tree* does not mean that there has to be a tree shrine (could also be a regular wayside_shrine and a tree which are too close together to tag them effectively as two different nodes)."
It is always possible to map close objects as a separate nodes (at least - in a decent editors). 2015-01-03 6:17 GMT+01:00 <wiki_openstreetmap_org.5.k...@spamgourmet.com>: > I started this tag back in Aug. 2012 to have a more detailed tag for tree > shrines which I often saw and still see on commercial maps. > This is my second time I start this RFC since I ran out of free time to > care about it the first time and it got stuck. > There already was wayside_shrine and wayside_cross at that time so the > idea was to get a little bit more depth into the shrine type. > > Everything I could think of can be found on the proposal page including > importance, name, rendering, tagging and disputes so I will not rewrite the > whole page in this mail. > I know that the page may is a little bit longer, but I hope that you will > read it and have some constructive criticism for me/the tag. > > Anything that would be changed while this proposal is running will be > noted in an updates section on the proposal page. > > The proposal can be found on: https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/Proposed_features/tree_shrine > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
