2015-01-02 8:55 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > all 13 nodes have been checked and edited by me manually (not using >> search-and-replace). since this case is not covered in the mechanical >> edit policy, IMHO this policy does not apply. >> > > In my opinion this does not qualify as mechanical edit. This was clearly > just a fix of an extremely limited number of nodes. >
+1 I think that it does matter, how many objects are changed, because changing 13 indicates that these are some edge cases or outliers or typos (or potentially also a new/alternative way of tagging), in any way nothing established (if these are all objects with these tags), while changing 500 objects is different in that it would seem to be something more established (and potentially more mappers involved, etc.), so I'd make the mechanical edit guidelines apply even if you looked at all of them "individually" (this "individual look" will still very likely not imply any kind of survey or on the ground truth). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
