Hi, Am 25.12.2014 um 20:45 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > cycleway=opposite is useful for marking that cyclists may drive in both > direction, \
Then cycleway=no/none would do the same. But I guess this is not the best idea for the same reason. > but there is no marked contraflow lane (for streets with contraflow lane > there is > cycleway=opposite_lane tag). ... or cycleway=opposite_track Is there an historic reason why this tag exists? Maybe oneway:bicycle=no was introduced afterwards and before it was implied from cycleway=opposite. Cheers Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
